Wednesday, January 26, 2011

400 hands of NL($4) ...

This is an awful lot of big hands in 400 hands. I guess the first one was a mistake in retrospect, especially considering KJ had me good, I was hoping for the overpair and the flush draw vs my top two. You can observe the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th hands to see why I am a pimp G not losing my whole stack with monster-like hands (ie. this is not my first time playing online poker).
1) Top 2 vs bottom set vs probably a flush draw. -$400.

2) Set under set. -$180.

3) AA vs OESD. -$160.

4) Set vs the backdoor automatic hits every time draw. -$80.

One winner that saved me. (besides holding AKvAQ AIPF for +$300)
5) Set over set. +$640.
I quit as a small loser on the day, because of the previous post -350 NL($1), and +200 in NL($4). I probably shouldn't have quit since I was in upswing mode and I hate to quit in upswing mode, but it is real late, would hate to go back on a downswing, I can't really handle the variance of NL($4) - pretty stupid!, and am having a few medical problems and need my sleep.

3 comments:

GoldGanesh said...

there was a few hands like 66 where you bet a third pot w/ your set. Is that standard? I usually like betting smaller in 3b pots if i flop nuts or something close to it.

anyways nice finish for the session

dobieatwar said...

It was half pot, 20 into 42.

Nevertheless there is nothing standard for me anymore. RUSH is full of stone cold killers and you have to confuse them.

I would make this same bet with a draw or a pair, not just a set.

I won't do this with air with 2 opponents, but sometimes with one.

The lines I take depend on stack sizes, position, opponents stats, opponents vision of me, my read of their hand or hand strength etc.

dobieatwar said...

I just realized I lost with flopped 666 and 999 in both NL($1) and NL($4) in one day.

It must be the sign of the devil as 999 is the upside down 666.